A Sacred Place - 1124 Words

A Sacred Place A sanctuary is a sacred place where a person can feel safe and find peace within oneself. It is the theme of sanctuary that relates Irene Zabytko’s â€Å"Home Soil†, Raymond Carver’s â€Å"A Small, Good Thing† and Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper†, to one another. In Irene Zabytko’s â€Å"Home Soil†, the narrator tato talks about the harsh experiences he had in his past. He talks about how he was forced by the German’s to go out and herd up the crowds in the streets, â€Å"...one of them shoved a gun into my hands and pushed me out into the streets†(Zabytko 492). Tato finds some excitement and thrill in the power he has over these crowds of people, â€Å"I too began to yell at people and held the rifle against my chest,†¦show more content†¦John puts his wife in the best room he feels will help with her recovery and that is the room that once was a nursery. Of all the rooms to put her in, the nursery should of been the last place, but how could he know of her condition, postpartum was unknown of during the late 1800’s. John saw the room as, â€Å"a big, airy room, the whole floor nearly, with windows that look all ways, and air and sunshine galore† (Gilman 591). The narrator wanted to stay in another room that she describes to be so peaceful in her eyes, â€Å"I wanted one downstairs that opened onto the piazza and had roses all over the window, and such pretty old-fashioned chintz hangings† (Gilman 591). John feels the room upstairs is the best sanctuary for his wife to get the best rest and relaxation in and to help with her â€Å"temporary nervous depression† (Gilman 590). The room is just the opposite for his wife, it is not a sanctuary for her because she becomes more and more crazier having to live in this room and always being reminded of how children use to live in the room. She has thoughts of suicide, â€Å"I am getting angry enough to do something desperate. To jump out of the window would be admirable exercise...† (Gilman 599). His wife knows that this room is not the best for her that this room cannot be a sanctuary for her. She is very far from feeling safe and secure inShow MoreRelatedSacred Places1504 Words   |  7 PagesThe World Trade Center: A Sacred Site R. Clark, J. Frazier July 4, 2010 Greg Underwood University of Phoenix The World Trade Center: Sacred Site Myths, while imagined, have their own explanations of the divine, that to the faithful and those who take the myth on faith , see as true, sacred and unquestioned. For those who do not see myths as religion and the lore and stories in it mere stories , events and elements in it are curiously close to the beliefs and persuasive elementsRead MoreSacred Places1363 Words   |  6 PagesMERGEFORMAT ï ¿ ½1ï ¿ ½ Sacred places represent the essential spirit of human kind, and at some point in time, was part of a significant event, ceremony, or spiritual worship. People venture to sacred places to satisfy the human spirit s desire for communion with themselves and their collective humanity. Sacred sites are the most loved and visited places on planet earth. When one arrives at a spiritual destination they find themselves closer to their individual realities. These places have the power toRead MoreThe Sacred Balance : Rediscovering Our Place1102 Words   |  5 Pagespollution, or other major environmental concerns.† (Loughlin). Drinking polluted water will harm individuals and their families but global warming has not appeared to danger us and so we do not worry about it (Walker). In the article, The Sacred Balance: Rediscovering Our Place in Nature, by David Suzuki, it is indicated that humans have lost interconnectedness with nature. In other words, people have put importance to the mo re unnecessary things, which are the main causes for us consuming chemicals in foodRead MoreReligious Traditions768 Words   |  4 PagesElements of Religious Traditions In the following paragraphs, I will explain how religious traditions describe and encourage the relationships with the divine, sacred time, sacred space or natural world, and with each other. Next, I will identify issues that are critical. Finally, I will include examples of various religious traditions. Relationship with the divine Divinity is the power of having attributes and the quality of being divine. In earlier times, divinity was believed to give anRead MoreThe Memorial And Museum At The World Trade Center1258 Words   |  6 Pagesfamilies and American people. Memorial gatherings and establishment of the memorial transformed the site into a sacred space for both religious and nonreligious men and women , not only in America but all around the globe. This essay examines 9/11 Memorial in the light of Micean Eliade â€Å" Sacred and Profane† In chapter 1 Eliade introduces a term hierophany. He defines it as something sacred that manifest itself to humans thought ordinary objects that belong to profane world. Those objects show dualityRead MoreThe Lord Of The Flies1441 Words   |  6 PagesTrump said, â€Å"The Theatre must always be a safe and special place†, and for once he is right, the Theatre is a special place place, where people and objects transform in front of our eyes. One element that helps make a play great, is if it effectively uses its sacred space. The definition of sacred space according to our lecture is, â€Å"A physical space that feels almost magical, sometimes it may transform or appear before our eyes.† Sacred space is not required to incorporate the entire stage eitherRead MoreSpace And Nature On Campus Essay959 Words   |  4 PagesEliadian Space and Nature on Campus At the end of each interview, I asked participants to describe a place on campus of particular importance. I then requested that they text me a photograph of the space the next time they experienced the emotions described during the interview. Five of six participants responded within twenty-four hours. Explaining her methods, Ammerman highlights the significance of visual research: â€Å"Taking the visual turn introduced a new set of stories†¦The data are producedRead MoreAmerican Indian Religious Freedom Act1690 Words   |  7 PagesPrior to the Second World War, religious places remained untouched as they were mainly located in rural areas. However, the period after the Second World War was characterized by an increase in population, corporate farming, a more vibrant timber industry as well as an expanded recreational industry. This change resulted in less respect for the public land, and the situation was made worse by the proliferation of state and federal agencies that have no respect for the public land. It thus becomesRead MoreThe Prayer Of The Sacred1678 Words   |  7 Pages For most religions, the sacred feels as though it is out of reach or untouchable. One typically cannot have a direct conversation with whom they consider sacred, so they pray to their god(s), hoping that their prayers will be heard and answered. Another aspect of following a religion is having a deep feeling of either love, respect or fear for the sacred. No matter the feeling, it is critical for one who follows it to reach out with prayer and tell their sacred how they feel,profess their faithRead MoreEloquent Feelings And Safe Places1139 Words   |  5 Pages Eloquent Feelings and Safe Places Stephen Dunn s poems makes sure to let the reader stop and think, and as a creative writing teacher he knows how to do just that. Winner of awards such as the â€Å"Pulitzer Prize for Poetry, â€Å"The James Wright Prize†,and the â€Å"Paterson Award for Sustained Literary Achievement†, his work â€Å"The Sacred†, published back in 1989, shows off his literary genius in normal experiences and captures

Corporal Punishment Argument Essay Free Essays

Corporal Punishment Argument Essay Corporal Punishment should not be enforced to teach children from misbehaving. To spank and to hit children in todays society Is considered morally wrong but often unpracticed. There is a fine line between abusive hitting and spanking your child on the caboose. We will write a custom essay sample on Corporal Punishment Argument Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now Parents who hit their children wither at home or in public leave mental and physical scars that could untimely influence violent behavior in children. Children who are physically punished at home hardly ever learn their lesson. Researchers from the Catalog of Physiologic Study have proved that punishing a child through corporal punishment only leads to more misbehaver. Instead, by confronting them in a calm matter has shown to work better by 35 percent, rather than hitting. In addition, by taking away something that the child possess dear to their hearts for a certain period of time forces them to behave in an orderly manner. For example, when a child runs up a cell phone bill, it would make more sense to take away the cell phone rather than physically spank the child and allowing them to keep the cell phone. By keeping the cell phone, children are more likely to take risks. Although, by taking away the phone children understand if they were to take another risk they would jeopardize not having a phone. Society can be viewed as extremely hypocritical. Their viewpoints on public corporal punishment can be seen as evil. More than 90 percent of the community disagrees with corporal punishment while they are in public, but only 15 percent will practice what they preach in their homes. This leaves about 85 percent of parents who exercise spanking in the comfort of their own homes. This hypocritical trait is what leads to frustration in parents and confusion in children. Many times the frustration from not being able to punish children in public leads to a more severe punishment at home. This is often seen when teachers notify higher authority when they see or suspect some sort of violence in their student’s homes. A child who receives corporal punishment undergoes more stress and emotional discomfort than any parent might from contributing punishment. The children’s helplessness can lead to more violent behavior; In addition, most children grow up to mimic the methods of discipline from their own parents or guardians. In 2008, child services survey announced that children who had been spanked at a younger age were at high risk of emotional damage, which often resulted to a poor and unsuccessful future. In addition most children loose respect and become accustomed to being hit by their parents. Most children aren’t fazed by others emotions because of their adapted ways. Spanking and hitting children are not the only idealistic methods to solving problems. The many viewpoints from parents, society and children are important to follow inorder to have a child who How to cite Corporal Punishment Argument Essay, Essay examples

Risk Management Process and Strategies for Risk - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theRisk Management Process and Strategies for Risk Types. Answer: Introduction Risk can be any event that occurs unplanned and results into positive or negative impacts on a project. Risks result from uncertainties in outcome of project activities. In risks, there are possibilities of facing losses or undesirable outcomes. Uncertainty and risks are often used interchangeably but the two are somewhat different uncertainty is the case where possible outcomes of a situation are known but their probabilities of occurrence cannot be judged while in the case of risk , risk impacts can be quantified as well as their probabilities can be known. Risk may not always lead to a loss but it is an outcome which is unfavourable to the project in some way. This favourability is relative to what a stakeholder is expecting from the project as an outcome. Two stakeholders can have different views on the same risk. Thus, their objective are required to be integrated which presents complexities on projects. A project needs to have appropriate strategies in place to ensure that these risks are managed well otherwise, the gap between expectations and actual outcomes would keep on increasing on the project. There are several tools and strategies that are available for reducing risks but these strategies may differ from industry to industry. In a manufacturing unit set-up project, risks may be managed through the use of appropriate contract arrangements with equipment and machinery vendors. Risk management is the process using which the risks can be minimized any reducing its probability of occurrence and reducing the severity resulting from its of occurrence in least possible time. Risk management is an iterative process that involves cycles of three steps including risk identification, risk analysis, risk response, and risk control. Risk Sources Types There could be many sources of a project risk and the impacts of these risks can have infinite possibilities. However, there are certain sources of risks that are more frequently seen and thus, can be categorized as the primary sources of project risk. These include: Client Characteristics: There are certain factors related to clients that can affect the outcomes of the project such as nature of business, form of business, track record of the client on managing manufacturing development projects, availability of funding, modes of compensation, attitude towards professional services, and the history of litigation or claims. These characteristics are important as they help in identifying the risks that can occur on a project as well as defined the impacts of those risks on the project. In the current case, the client is the manufacturing organization that have sufficient funds available for establishment and has a clean record of paying companies that they outsource their services to. Project Nature: Certain project related factors such as relationships between program budget and schedule, project site, political profile, project type, and applicable laws or regulations, can also affect the types of risks and their impacts on a project. Professional Services: Many projects involve services from a third party companies including equipment suppliers, contraction contractors, and architects which makes the project dependent on the availability and experience of these third parties. Project delivery Method: Modes and methods of delivery of a project can be different with different types of projects. For instance, a construction project can be delivered through one general contractor handling all sub-contractors or through involvement of multiple prime contractors who would be delivering the project directly. Moreover, with the level of complexities and size of the project, the familiarity with the contractors and sub-contractors can vary which would affect the speed of approvals and construction. Others: There can also be other parties to contract or project that can affect the risk portfolio of a project based on their involvement and influence on the project. These parties can include employees, project team, regulatory bodies, public communities and more such internal and external stakeholders. For instance, in case of a manufacturing unit establishment is a design professional involved in a product development then the skill, experience, and the compensation offered to the contractors involved in factory set up and implementation of the manufacturing equipments would affect the wooden factory establishment. Risks can be mainly of two types that include endogenous and exogenous risks. Endogenous risks arise from the shocks within an organization while exogenous risks result from shocks received from outside the company(Danielsson, 2012). Exogenous factors can include marketing plans of an organization, its market reputation(Milhaud, 2012), Risk Assessment Once risk sources are identified, the risks that are likely to occur on a project can easily be identified and then, the next step is to assess these risks. This assessment involves understanding of the probability of the occurrence of the risk and the impact of the risk event on the project. Certain risks can have very low probability of occurrence but if they occur, they can be catastrophic in nature while some risks occurring more frequently can have very minor consequences that can be avoided on a project. Considering these two aspects, the severity of the risk can be determined by considering both the measures. A common method of facilitation for risk management is the use of risk matrix and filtering. It gives a sharper view of the risks faced a company by exploring a large set of risk scenarios that are complex in nature. The filtering breaks down risks into their sub-components such that they are individually evaluated to assess their contribution to the overall project risk. Risks are prioritized based on certain risk factors and criterias of evaluation and risk scores are calculated accordingly(SORNETTE, et al., 003). The steps followed in this method of risk assessment include: Defining risks and system scope: First step in any risk management practice involves identification of a risk question answer to which would make the goal for risk assessment. For instance, if the question is if the raw materials would be sufficiently available in the market to produce furnishing products as per the market demand, then the goal of the risk management would become assurance of appropriate selection of products for manufacturing that can be produced from the raw materials that are easily available with the suppliers that are nearby and in good quantities. The scope of the risk management practice and the system must be clearly defined at this stage such that the boundaries of project are clearly identified. Project teams can also narrow down on the scopes by using qualitative filtering techniques. For instance, a company can filter out products based on their level of returns such that products giving low returns because of less profit margins are ruled out. Defining Risk Topics: Once the risks and project scope are clearly identified, a cross-functional team on a project can go deeper down these risks to identify head topics and subtopics. Head topics are those risk factors that are directly connected to the risk question while subtopics are those factors that can impact the risk which is associated with the head topic. These topics can be seen as the sources of project risks and these are evaluated and given risk scores. The risk sources or topics in case of factory establishment projects are production plans, quality measures, regulatory requirements, raw materials, products, and industrial procedures. Sub-topics that can come under various risk sources include: Workcentres under production units, unit operations under workcentres, and process steps under operations. Product quality under quality measures, production quality under product quality, and process quality under production quality Furniture types under products, raw material mixes under furniture types, quality under raw material mixes While it is essential to identify risk sources, it is also important to identify who would be responsible for these risks which is an outcome of mutual discussions between key stakeholders. Trade-offs has to be made between the accuracy of these details and the resources including time and human capital. Depending on the nature of a situation, the level of detail required and the quantity of resources to be used can be decided. One way to identify required level of detail is by making a comparison between the risks at different levels of details with the need for resources for risk mitigation at these levels. The severity of risk would decide the level of efforts that must be put for managing or mitigating risks. Another factor that would play a key role in determining the level of detail to be obtained is the target time that would be consumed in the assessment of specific risk component(PQRI, 2015). Evaluation Criteria: Once risk categories are sufficiently identified, an evaluation criteria has to be established which must address the concerns of probability of occurrence and severity of a risk. This criteria should be able to bridge any gap that exists between various risk components and the risk questions. A question can be asked to do this such as How can we understand the contribution that this risk component gives to the overall project risk? In the stage of evaluation, a balance has to be created between the level of details and the level of efforts required. Most simple evaluation model identifies likelihood of the component causing harm to project and the severity of the impact caused. These evaluations are mostly subjective and thus, level of details is sacrificed for attaining simplicity and speed of decision. Another model uses these two criterias for evaluation by forming a risk matrix such that both probability of risk occurrence and its impact are related to the p otential project failures(Roy Brahma, 2012). For instance, in the case of check on the quality of products produced in the furniture manufacturing unit, a risk matrix can be prepared as shown below: Figure 1: Risk Matrix A more complex and detailed evaluation method is multi-factor evaluation in which a degree of objectivity is used along with the level of details for the assessment of project risks. This would involve multiple factors that can be used for evaluating risks at the same time with additional criterias defined adding to the overall justification of severity or probability of risk occurrence. This probability may relate to the capability of the risk component to detect a defect or deviation from normal. Some of the criterias that can be used for assessing risks in a manufacturing site include last occurrence of defect, strength of quality controls, adequacy of staffing levels, and ability of audit to detect a deviation. Scoring Models: After evaluation criteria are clearly defined, a scoring model can be developed including all the identified risk criteria to arrive at a single score for each risk(Smaga, 2014). This score can be calculated using multiplication or addition of the weightages of different criteria based on their importance. Some examples of scoring models include Risk matrix that reflects scores on either side of zero to represent low and high risks. Table A: Risk Assessment Assessment criteria Scoring Score Potential for harm to project -10 to +10 +6 Non-conformance level -3 to +3 -3 Ability to detect defects -5 to +5 +4 Staff adequacy levels -3 to +3 -2 +5 Multifactor multiplicative scoring which involves multiplication or divisions between individual scored to calculate the total score Table B: Multifactor multiplicative scoring Assessment criteria Scoring Score Potential for harm to company reputation 0 to 10 8 Non-conformance to quality level 0 to 3 2 Ability to detect defects in furnitures 0 to 5 4 Staff adequacy levels 0 to 3 1 15 Weighted scoring method gives a weightage to each criterion such that these scores are added or averaged to calculate the final score which is represented using percentages. Table C: Weighted scoring Assessment criteria Score Weight Weighted score Potential for harm to company reputation 8 50% 4 Non-conformance to quality level 2 20% 0.4 Ability to detect defects in furnitures 4 30% 1.2 Staff adequacy levels 1 10% 0.1 +5 Score for Risk Components: After deciding on the risk scoring model between the project team, scoring can start. Most often, the scoring model is first pilot tested and reviewed by stakeholders to get their buy-in and later team rules are developed through multiple scoring sessions that would lead to standardization. Subtopic Filtering: Risk matrix can also be narrowed down to the subtopics such as shown in the figure below where warehousing and plant maintenance are chosen two subtopics that are identified in the matrix as producing low risk while packaging, complaints, and product release are some of the subtopics posing high risk to the project. Figure 2: Risk Probability vs Severity Ranking and filtering can help develop reviews of project risks such that based on the cumulative scores of risk components, priorities can be defined for establishing control over those risks. For instance, a low cumulative score of risk can be respondent to with lower level of control and thus, would be given a lower priority as compared to high risk topics. In the current example of manufacturing unit risks, risk control can be enhanced for the high risk categories such as release and QC lab while it can be reduced for low risk categories like warehousing and maintenance. When control over the low risk categories is eliminating, it results into reduction of the scope of risk management. Also, elimination of the products that can lead to high risks can further reduce the project portfolio size. High focus on the high risk areas can also help in evaluating the mitigation options. Risk Review: The results can then be revaluated through the scoring model to identify best mitigation options. For this cross-system scores can be gathered on topics for evaluation for re-scoring. An operational feedback would further confirm if the risk control strategies are sufficiently addressing the risk question. The feedback would also ensure that assumptions about the residual risks hold true. Residual risks are those risks that remain even after the risk control procedures have been applied. In the process, new risks can also appear that may not have been identified earlier in the control measures in which case, the control measures have to be updated based on the feedback Risk Communication: The risk ranking and filtering output has to be communication sufficiently to decision makers who are authorized and a standard operating procedure has to be documented which would provide a way to implement the decided control measures. This can be useful not only in controlling specific project risks but also the portfolio of risks for enhancing control Project risk management strategies Risk management is not just about elimination of risks but it plays a more crucial role by strengthening the management practices which is fundamental to any organization. This could be a reason why organizations have started to give more value to the risk management practices. A 2011 survey conducted by McKinsey found that boards only take reviews and approve proposed risk management strategies as per 44% of the survey respondents. Only 14% of the respondents in the survey had observed companies using risk management practices or were having a complete knowledge of risks faced by an organization. Many directors still felt that the information they received through reviews was only short term. Different types of risks that can be identified on the manufacturing unit establishment project include financial risks, equipment risks, outsourcing risks, environmental risks, and safety or health related risks. For managing most risks, companies adopt a governance framework that provides some risk management principles, standards, codes, and incentives. Most times, risk governance falls into a state level or national level practice with codes defined by commissions for establishing an internal control over risks in an organization. COSO has a guidance published for risk assessment which gives guidance on certain risk related issues(Pasztor, 2011). International Organization for Standardization gives guidance on implementation of the risk management practice. ISO 31000 is a de facto standard used for risk management guidelines which has a variety of different methodologies and practices defined in it. One of the risk governance practices defined includes thematic peer reviews which are defined by a Financial Stability Board. . However, organizational heads still feel that there is a lack of guidance on risk management which is adequate for specific project purposes. There are certain gaps in frameworks and risk governance codes making it difficult for companies to create a strong risk management structure with effective appetite for risks. However, use of sound risk governance practices can still help companies regulate their project resources. The rules and agreements are defined for specific jurisdictions following specific laws such as company laws of Germany and Austria and stock exchange laws of Mexico. These governing laws mostly deal with the issues of project audits. Turnbull guidance is a specific audit guidance provided by UK government while risk governance guidance has been provided for the listed boards by the Corporate Governance council of Singapore (OECD, 2014). At the organizational level, there can be four strategies to respond to risks including ignorance of risk, transfer of risk to a third party, avoiding of risk and its mitigation(Alfiana, et al., 2016). Depending on the risk score, the severity of risk is assessed and appropriate response strategy is selected. For instance, in case of risks posing high severity, the risk is best avoided through appropriate control measures. There would be certain residual risks that would still occur despite all control measures taken and these risk impacts have to be mitigation by identifying appropriate method chosen from unlimited possibilities. Most endogenous risks can be avoided as the probabilities are better known while exogenous risks that occur because of external factors have to be respondent with a mitigation strategy or through transfer of the risk to the external party(Shogren Crocker, 2000). Conclusions The objective of this report was to explore how risk management practices are used in a manufacturing unit establishment project including the different steps involved such as risk definition, risk source identification, risk assessment, risk scoring, and risk management strategies development for risk minimization their risks. Some common risk sources were identified including client characteristics, project nature, professional services and project delivery methods. The exploration of risk management process lead to the discovery of some risk management steps that are used in organizations risk definition, risk topics identification, risk evaluation, scoring, subtopic filtering, risk review, and risk communication. The report also identified some scoring models such as risk matrix, multiplicative scoring, and weighted scoring. It was found that companies can use risk control strategies that are given priority based on risk score for avoiding the risks but there can still be some re sidual risks for which mitigation plan has to be made. References Alfiana, E., Sule, T., Sutisna Masyita, D., 2016. Impact Of Exogenous And Endogenous Risks On Systemic Risk In Indonesian Banking. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, pp. 77-82. Danielsson, J., 2012. Endogenous Risk , s.l.: Hyun Song Shin. Milhaud, X., 2012. Exogenous and endogenous risk factors management to predict surrender behaviours, s.l.: HAL. OECD, 2014. Risk Management and Corporate Governance, s.l.: OECD. Pasztor, J., 2011. Endogenous Risk and Dangers to Market Stability , s.l.: College of Financial Planning. PQRI, 2015. Risk Ranking and Filtering, s.l.: PQRI. Roy, S. K. Brahma, R., 2012. RISK MANAGEMENT IN PROJECT AN INSIGHT, s.l.: Nalco. Shogren, J. F. Crocker, T. D., 2000. Endogenous Risk and Environmental Policy, s.l.: Iowa State University. Smaga, P., 2014. The Concept of Systemic Risk , s.l.: LSE. SORNETTE, D. et al., 003. Endogenous versus exogenous dynamics and scaling laws in Cyber-risks , Zurich, Switzerland: ETH.